|
Back to NTI-tss main page menu |
||
|
||
| he position of the contact(s) during parafunction dictate the
potential
degree of resultant joint strain (if any). Whereas in bilateral
clenching (no effective condylar translation on either side), there
is insignificant (if any) joint strain.
A contralateral, most distal contact contact is made possible by the continuing contraction of the contralateral temporalis. The force generated by the ipsilateral inferior Lateral Pterygoid is directed at the point of resistance, (that being the contralateral contact) which is in a mesial direction (which is the least desirable). This also demonstrates the irony of "posterior support for the joint". In the adjacent example, the right condyle is stablized and minimally strained due to the posterior contact on its side, which is only made possible by a parafunctional contraction of the right temporalis. If not for that activity, there would be no need for "posterior support". |
Boyd
Classification of Parafunction
2a: Unilateral posterior resistance, Contralateral joint strain/load
Some texts on occlusion refer to the "spasming of the LP
|
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
||
|
|
||