|
Rationale
for questions
1-5. The goal is to
confirm
a "foundation" for the headaches. There is nothing normal about
waking
with any degree of discomfort, although a majority of chronic headache
suffers accept a tolerable degree of discomfort as acceptable and
unremarkable. They have succumbed to the regular pain,
and
report only their most intolerable pain.
6. This is what the patient
is most
concerned with, and what previous treatments have been aimed at.
Confirm with the patient that this too is your goal, but to prevent the
worst pain the causative and perpetuating activity that creates the
"foundation"
is necessary.
7. The patients who
have severe
afternoon episodes usually have more muscular parafunction throughout
the
day. Although the answer may be "sometime in the afternoon" (and
therefore the patient's focus), they still have discomfort at other
times
of the day. Those who report more severe afternoon episodes have
a greater necessity for a "Daytime" device. Patients reporting
the
most severe episodes upon waking or in the morning (some will report
they
are awakened from sleep) may have less of a necessity for a daytime
device.
8. This is usually
what they
report to a physician, and may have been interpreted as how many
headaches
per week (or month) they have, when it simply indicates how intense
their
(nearly) on-going discomfort can get.
For example, if the response
was
"5 times per month", you might reply: "If your worst headache lasts for
two days, then that takes up 10 days per month. So then, does
that
mean you have a "zero" the other 20 days per
month?"
9. The position of
the mandible
during the muscular parafunction events dictates the origin of the
discomfort.
Examples-- Bilateral temporal pain: centric
clenching;
Unilateral temporal: unilateral clenching; Frontal
(sinus)
with neck symptoms: protrusive clenching; Facial and TMJ:
excursive
clenching... or alternating combinations.
10. This is a rule
out type
of question. Terms which DO NOT comply with myofascial pain
(examples:
shocking, jolting, knife-like) should be further investigated by a
physician.
11-15. Just to
confirm that
you are NOT the first provider that the patient has consulted with
regarding
their headaches. If you are, and the patient has been having the
headaches for less than one year, insist they see their physician for a
complete work-up. If it has been more than one year, note in the
chart that you recommend a full medical work-up.
14-16. Do not
recommend that
the patient change any of their medications. Note that most
preventive
medications are taken before bed.
As you review the
questionnaire responses
and listen to their comments, imagine if what they describe could be
caused
and/or perpetuated highly intense nocturnal clenching, and what type of
clenching activity might be required to relate to their
responses.
There is nothing normal about the activities you'll be imagining... if
fact, you might think, "That would be pretty weird if they were to do
that...",
which
is exactly the point. The patient in front of you has most
likely
been given a clean bill of health, yet they are miserable. What
they
are doing must be pretty weird from them to be where they are.
Also,
the patient may tell you things that they think you want to (or might
need
to) know. They may provide what they think are insights or
suggestions.
Something to consider always: Imagine the patient
has been
"possessed" by the muscular parafunction animal. Sometimes, "the
animal" is speaking to you through the patient. It is trying
to
mislead you. It does not want to be disturbed. For
example,
the patient might say: "I feel that my bite is off", or, "I can't
find a place where my teeth are supposed to come together". The
animal
is trying to convince you that you should improve the occlusal
scheme.
Why? Because that would make the animal a better clencher.
At this moment, remind the patient: "You see! 'The Condition' is
talking to us! It wants to keep on with its activity. Why
would
you comment that your 'bite' was off or needed to be improved if you
weren't
biting frequently?"
|